Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(17)
To assess whether, among other prognostic factors, a history of Cesarean section is associated with endometrial ablation failure in the treatment of menorrhagia.
This systematic review has demonstrated that according to current data in the literature, there is some evidence to suggest that non-closure of the peritoneum after caesarean section is associated with more adhesion formation compared to closure.
Also, delivery via caesarean section is associated with an increased risk (estimated at 20 80%) of asthma this increased risk is attributed to the lack of healthy bacterial colonization that the newborn would have acquired from passage through the birth canal.
Most authors conclude that cesarean section is associated with increased short term maternal morbidity.
Cesarean section is associated with several adverse effects on women and newborns [ 27].
In general, caesarean section is associated with an increased risk for complications compared to spontaneous vaginal delivery.
Similar(43)
In women, child birth and caesarean section were associated with increased risk of HCV infection, although the association was marginally significant for delivery (p = 0.06).
Similarly, Smith GC, et al. reported that prior cesarean section was associated with unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy and suggested that this association might be manifestation of abnormal uterine blood flow caused by intentional or inadvertent ligation of major uterine vessels during prior cesarean section and abnormal placentation caused by uterine scar [ 20].
Cesarean section was associated with decreased survival (P <.006).
None of the factors of the general questions section were associated with the main treatment selections (Table 3).
Delivery by caesarean section was associated with increased admission to the neonatal intensive care unit for cephalic second twins, adjusted odds ratio 3.8 (1.2-12.7).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com