Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Methods section demonstrates a research methodology used to compute and analyze the three types of errors for the comparative study.
The L-threonine subnetwork described in this section demonstrates a biologically intuitive pathway-like structure.
Quantitative assessment of liver sections demonstrated a 68% reduction in cross-sectional granuloma density in Cd36 -/- mice (median 116 (range 46 to 124) vs 359 (239 to 489) granulomas/cm; p = 0.029; Figure 2G).
The analysis of these paired sections demonstrated a linear correlation between the positive areas of both proteins in each specimen (Fig. 5F, bottom left).
The biotin-phenol reaction of the DRG sections demonstrated a robust streptavidin-Cy3 signal, completely overlapping the GFP fluorescence (Fig. 2C E).
Comparative analysis of quantitative autoradiographic images and densitometry of immunohistochemically stained and co-registered adjacent tissue sections demonstrated a strong linear correlation between the magnitude of [18F]FEDL binding and HIP/PAP expression in corresponding regions (r = 0.88).
Almost all the filaments from patients 1 4 that were cut longitudinally, obliquely, and in cross-section demonstrated a hollow medulla and surrounding cortex.
Representative histological sections demonstrated a significant disparity in both the number and quality of the regenerated nerve fibers in the three groups.
Indeed, quantifying capillaries in the tissue sections, demonstrated a substantial decrease in vessel density in tumors of 6B12-treated animals compared to the control.
Transversal CT sections demonstrated a normal aeration of the right lung whereas 3D reconstruction of the airways demonstrated a short but tight bronchial stenosis located at the site of the initial rupture.
Further analysis of the volume of each hemisphere based on brain sections demonstrated a significant decrease in the poststroke brain volume in GITR Ab mice, and a significant increase in that of GITR Fc mice, compared with control mice.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com