Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(17)
Another participant described changes in individual smoking behaviors as a result of knowledge of the risks of secondary smoke: "They are more aware of the dangers of smoking to other people.
As it can see from Table 2, there is a significant connection between the level of nicotine in the breathed air and the urine level of nicotine and cotinine, proving that the secondary smoke can be almost as dangerous as the primary/direct smoking.
A more probable explanation for the persistent mutational induction observed in the quitters may involve continued passive exposure, since smoking mothers are far more likely to also be exposed to secondary smoke in the home [ 49].
Or maybe it was the secondary smoke.
No word here about secondary smoke -- the air pollution that doesn't go through a cigarette filter.
"Secondary smoke is horrible and dangerous," Mr. McCormick said over a plate of spare ribs and a glass of lemonade.
Similar(43)
Analysts would worry if this suit led to more liability cases based on secondary-smoke inhalation.
In a secondary analysis, non-smokers were then broken out into those likely to have ongoing exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and those actively avoiding passive or secondary smoking exposure.
45% of the population reported in Manchester et al [ 21] actively smoked throughout pregnancy, and another 33% reported ongoing exposure to secondary tobacco smoke; only 13% could be considered unexposed.
It has now been unambiguously established that cigarette smoking causes lung and other cancers, and that exposure to secondary tobacco smoke exhaled by smokers also has a causal role in carcinogenesis [ 1, 2].
Misclassification of exposure to secondary tobacco smoke 35 may have occurred in this study because information about smoking was only available from mothers at the beginning of pregnancy, and no information was available from fathers or other childcare providers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com