Sentence examples for secondary differences from inspiring English sources

It would be dismaying if any affiliates should choose to disengage now because of secondary differences which could easily be resolved.

These differences may be due to intrinsic Ca2+ release properties of the two RyR isoforms, but is not to secondary differences (e.g., [Ca2+]i or [Ca2+]SR) induced by expression of each isoform, because a combined phenotype of caffeine-induced Ca2+ release was observed when the two isoforms were co-expressed (Fig. 5).

Such unevenness may not be apparent in an image of slope gradient, which is the destination of a primary difference (Evans 1980); however, the noise is more evident in an image uses a concept of secondary difference (e.g., Laplacian filter or curvature) in the calculation process (Guth 2006).

In the present study, triglyceride and cholesterol levels were similar in Type 2 diabetes, NAFLD and controls which could explain the lack of secondary difference in cardiac metabolism.

Although our analysis included four separate cost domains, we could not estimate secondary cost differences arising from differences in resource allocation as a result of the different therapies.

For secondary endpoints, differences between groups were analyzed with chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests in case of dichotomous variables; differences in means were compared with student's t-tests, as appropriate.

The within-upper secondary competency differences in Estonia, Ireland, Japan and Korea seems to be almost negligible and are statistically not significant in Estonia and Ireland.

One-way ANOVAs indicated no within-examiner secondary rotations differences.

No secondary structure differences were observed between native hTP, hTP 5IUR complex structure and the previously reported hTP structures [13,14].

This program was used to compute predicted secondary structures, differences in secondary structures and corresponding free energy changes (Δ G) for a 100-nt window around the UTR-SNP site.

Each IR was reviewed by two investigators (independent primary and secondary reviewers); differences in interpretation were reviewed by monthly phone calls to achieve consensus.