Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
Second, investigators might be unaware of the need for independent ethical clearance, informed consent, and confidentiality protections.
Second, investigators may share trial data on their own terms in response to individual requests.
Second, investigators have not conducted a thorough psychometric assessment of the treatment satisfaction instrument we used in this study.
First, investigators may choose to leave unappealing data unpublished, a phenomenon known as publication bias. 2 3 Second, investigators may publish trial results, but report only those outcomes whose results support their desired conclusion, known as outcome reporting bias.
The inter-observer variability was then calculated as the mean absolute difference between the two readings from the first and second investigators divided by their mean and expressed as a percentage.
Similar(55)
All data was reviewed by a second investigator.
Thereafter, the third AFM evaluation of roughness parameters (T2) was obtained blindly by a second investigator.
A second investigator assessed the outcomes in both the control and experimental groups.
Results from the second investigator were used only to provide interrater reliability estimates.
All measurements from the investigator RP were averaged and compared to an average of the second investigator's measurements (RL).
If a decision was still unattainable, a second investigator reviewed the article before reaching a consensual decision.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com