Suggestions(4)
Exact(7)
We found no significant difference between the second and third survey waves (Ps≥0.18), except for the estimated probability of an epidemic outbreak (P<0.001).
We also found a significantly smaller estimated daily dose of medication needed in the second and third survey waves than in the first survey wave.
Respondents indicated a greater daily dose in the first survey wave (for a mean of 62.6) than in the second and third survey waves (for a mean of 58.3, 58.6, respectively; Ps = 0.001), with no significant difference between the second and third survey waves (P = 0.83).
There were also no significant differences between the second and third survey waves on the medication estimate (P = 0.89 and 0.79, respectively), and no significant interaction effect (P = 0.06 and 0.96, respectively).
We conducted the second and third survey waves four months and eleven months, respectively, after the earthquake (the second wave: September to October, 2008; the third wave: April to May, 2009).
In order to investigate the robustness of the earlier finding, to understand the progression of this phenomenon, and to test the potential explanations of this effect, we conducted second and third survey waves.
Similar(53)
The impacts of subsequent changes in the programme were investigated in the second and third surveys.
The first sampling period captured initial colonization, while the second and third surveys measured the influence of the wet fall and dry winter periods, respectively, for a full-year cycle of post-disturbance response from the plant community perspective.
The second and third surveys were carried out at eight sites (SXG, XYD, BL, YH, HW, LG and PT, NB, Figure 1) in the same areas from 16 to 31 Dec in 2008 and from 16 Jul to 31 Aug in 2009, and 331 and 301 samples were measured, respectively.
In the second and third surveys, a flood status question was included.
The classification accuracy increased to 79% and 74%, respectively, in the second and third surveys.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com