Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Mean weight was found to be higher for boys compared to girls for the first and second age groups (P < 0.001 and P = 0.018 respectively) while no such differences were observed in the other age groups.
Similar(59)
The first age group had less than 10 years old exclosure with triplicate sites (Halla, Meligim, and Adihantaweynay), the second age group was 10 to 20 years old exclosure with triplicate sites (Gurzoemni, Mezewle, and Endagebriel), and the third age group had 20 to 30 years old exclosure with triplicates sites (Addikolakul, Wereriba, and Shul-koma).
The short version for the first age group consists of matrix reasoning and recognizing, and for the second age group matrix reasoning and spatial orientation [ 35].
For the second age group (34 49) we found higher correlations between scores of SOGS and MOCQ.
The second age group (18 19 months) represents the end-stage of amyloid pathology.
Although the second age group showed an odds ratio of 2.97 (p = 0.002) for antidementia treatment compared with the oldest age group, the third and the fourth age groups were not significantly different from the oldest age group.
No differences were observed in these variables between boys and girls at the first age group while from the second age group onwards there was a significantly higher intake for boys compared to girls.
For women, it is possible to note that the values tend to decrease from the second age group and basically remain low until the 52 years limit.
Most of the responders were at the second age group (45 64) and their place of residence was urban, irrespective to their ethnicity.
One exception was care due to cerebrovascular and ischemic heart disease that was strongly (OR 5.4; p = 0.021) associated with CWP in this second age group.
The most involved age group in pathological levels of gambling was the first (18 33 years old), while the threshold cases belonged predominantly to the second age group (39 49 years old).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com