Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Four days post admission, she started to have stimulus-induced elevations in her blood pressure from systolic blood pressure (SBP) 100 to 140 sec, heart rate from 80 to 110 sec.
Similar(59)
The duration of the Atypical_AF_3D.avi, and Atypical_AF_3D.avi movies is 47 sec, representing approximately 20 h of heart rate dynamics.
Note: The duration of the Typical_AF_2D.avi and Typical_AF_3D.avi movies is 56 sec, representing approximately 24 h of heart rate dynamics.
Note: The duration of the Sleep2D.avi and Sleep3D.avi movies is 3 min 20 sec, representing approximately 6 hours of heart rate dynamics obtained during sleep.
Complications were categorized as respiratory (decrease in oxygen saturation < 90% for > 120 sec), hemodynamic (decrease in systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or decrease in heart rate below 50/min for > 120 sec), agitation (necessitating premature ending of the procedure).
Heart rate reached a maximal level 30 40 sec after the injection, but surprisingly, the arrhythmias in db/db mice were delayed till 5 10 minutes after adrenergic stimulation.
Resting heart rate was measured by a 30-sec auscultation, before blood pressure measurement.
We then calculated the immediate heart rate from the R-R interval (RRi in sec) as: Heart rate (in beat per minute, bpm) = 60/RRi Using Ethographer v.1.3 [11], the RRi were interpolated with a linearly spline and then re-sampled at every 100 ms and a Fast Fourrier Transform was conducted on the re-sampled data over periods comprising 2048 data points with a step of 5 sec.
Heart rate recovery was measured for at least 90 sec after the step test, regressed against recovery time, and expressed as the HR above sleep at 1 min post stepping (Brage et al., 2007).
Precipitous allergen-induced decreases in heart rate and systolic and diastolic pressure were maximal 72 sec following ragweed deposition in alveolar regions of the lungs.
The system was set to sample the mean, systolic, diastolic and pulse pressure, heart rate (HR) and locomotor activity over a 10-sec interval and record their average values.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com