seamless to merge

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "seamless to merge" is not correct in English as it lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure.
It could be used in contexts discussing integration or combining elements smoothly, but it needs rephrasing for clarity. Example: "The new software allows for a seamless merge of data from different sources."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Let's be honest, there is no seamless way to merge Halachic Judaism with modern life.

Vice

The pairing of the tasteful genius behind "Batman & Robin" and the English peer who paid homage to T. S. Eliot by having grown men prance around wearing jerkins knitted from tabbies: what flash of fate brought these two together to merge into a seamless whole?

The New Yorker

ACCESS RAMPS -- To evaluate the engine and transmission, take an entry ramp onto a highway and look for smooth, seamless acceleration as you speed up to merge into the traffic.

The New York Times - Travel

Zeitz is a rare figure in the corporate world, for he is able to merge big business with grassroots sport in an apparently seamless weave.

The Guardian - Sport

The idea, co-founder and CEO Bruno Zamborlin tells me, is to merge "the physical and the data worlds" in a more seamless way than has been previously possible, ridding us of unnecessary keyboards, buttons and touch screens.

TechCrunch

Vodafone's agreement to merge its United States operations into a joint venture with Bell Atlantic and the GTE Corporation could speed the advent of seamless trans-Atlantic roaming.

The New York Times

To merge?

The New Yorker

3. Learn to merge.

The New York Times

Gender roles begin to merge.

The New York Times

We're going to merge".

The New Yorker

§ 708a.302 Authority to merge.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

For clarity, rephrase "seamless to merge" as "seamlessly integrate" or "smoothly combine". This ensures grammatical correctness and better readability.

Common error

Avoid using "seamless to merge" as it is grammatically awkward. Instead, opt for more natural phrasing like "seamlessly merge" or "smoothly integrate".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "seamless to merge" attempts to describe a smooth integration process. However, it is grammatically incorrect. As noted by Ludwig AI, the structure lacks clarity and proper grammatical form. Better alternatives are "seamlessly merge" or "smoothly integrate".

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "seamless to merge" is flagged by Ludwig AI as grammatically incorrect, lacking the clarity needed for effective communication. While it aims to convey the idea of a smooth integration, its structure is awkward and non-standard. Better alternatives include phrases like "seamlessly merge", "smoothly integrate", or "seamless integration". When aiming for clarity and correctness, particularly in professional or technical contexts, it's crucial to opt for grammatically sound alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

join together seamlessly

Emphasizes the act of joining and the smooth nature of the process.

merge seamlessly

Inverts the order, emphasizing the merging process as smooth.

seamlessly integrate

Focuses on the act of integration happening without disruption.

smoothly combine

Emphasizes the ease and lack of friction in the combination process.

integrate flawlessly

Highlights the perfection of the integration, suggesting no errors or issues.

effortlessly blend

Uses 'blend' to suggest a more subtle combination, achieved with minimal effort.

harmoniously unite

Implies a pleasing and agreeable combination, often used in artistic or relational contexts.

perfectly fuse

Suggests a complete and irreversible combination, often used in scientific or technological contexts.

coalesce smoothly

Uses 'coalesce' for a gradual merging, highlighting a natural process.

unite without disruption

Highlights the absence of any interruption or disturbance during the uniting process.

FAQs

What's a more grammatically sound way to say "seamless to merge"?

Instead of "seamless to merge", consider using phrases like "seamlessly integrate" or "smoothly combine" which are grammatically correct and clearer.

How can I use the concept of a seamless combination in a sentence?

You can use phrases like "The software allows for a "seamless integration" of data" or "The design "smoothly combines" form and function".

Is "seamless to merge" considered proper English?

No, "seamless to merge" is not considered proper English. It's better to use phrases like "seamlessly merge" or "integrate seamlessly".

What are some alternatives to "seamless to merge" that emphasize ease and efficiency?

Alternatives that highlight ease and efficiency include "effortlessly blend" or "integrate flawlessly".