Sentence examples for scrutiny to evaluate from inspiring English sources

Accordingly, traditional medicines are currently undergoing scrutiny to evaluate their effectiveness and monitor adverse events [3], [13].

Meanwhile, adult kidney populations have received intense scrutiny to re-evaluate their properties in the context of normal homoeostasis and disease, identifying a cast of stem and progenitor cells that are the subject of ongoing research and debate.

It prevents public scrutiny of the prosecutors themselves to evaluate whether they offered a sweetheart deal and it hurts private citizens who may have an individual cause of action against a corporate wrongdoer.

However uncomfortable I might find the scrutiny, it is proper for my audience to evaluate my novel on the spectrum between revelation and exploitation, and to criticize me if I descend into sensationalism.

In the present study, despite the relatively small number of diabetes cases, we were able to detect differences between the groups, that is, the study was not underpowered to evaluate the differences under scrutiny.

He argued it was "borne out of an immeasurable amount of scrutiny following the death of Michael Brown" but pledged to "evaluate the recommedations and move forward".

It therefore remains desirable to evaluate existing signatures in greater scrutiny on a reasonably sized and representative breast cancer cohort and pinpoint important specifications for more effective use of molecular-based tests in clinical settings.

To evaluate the degree of rigor and scrutiny EFSA applied in its assessment of the Monsanto study [12] and Hammond et al. [14] as elements of the NK603 risk assessment procedure.

The challenger has urged the court to evaluate the restriction under the same strict-scrutiny standard that Judge Chhabria applied in IMDb.com.

Its 2016 sunset review of the Naturopathic Doctor Act, which was meant to evaluate the law and the need for continued regulation, failed to give comprehensive scrutiny of naturopathic practices.

In our paper, we sought to evaluate whether that disproportionate media coverage was justified by examining how well contrarian hypotheses have withstood scientific scrutiny and the test of time.