scrutinizing for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "scrutinizing for" is not commonly used in written English and may sound awkward.
It can be used when referring to the act of examining something closely in search of specific details or information, but it is better to use it in a more natural context. Example: "The researchers were scrutinizing for any signs of error in the data collected during the experiment."

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

But there is no sense in scrutinizing for consistency a farrago like this book.

The New York Times - Books

Finally the writer met Dr. Sonne & found he was the man he had been scrutinizing for a year & a half.

The New Yorker

Beyond its debated usefulness to investors, Mr. Gentry indicated that companies were using this data in surprising and often sophisticated ways, scrutinizing, for example, the potential for high emissions to tarnish a brand.

The New York Times

But it is disappointing that the notebook that Einstein used to work out his theory and that scholars are still scrutinizing for clues about how he did it was not available for the exhibition.

The New York Times - Arts

After Mr. Valcke — whom Swiss authorities are scrutinizing for "various acts of criminal mismanagement" — was placed on leave in September, Mr. Kattner succeeded him in that job, overseeing the organization's contracts and money.

The New York Times - Sports

"This is yet another laughable reason to delay a project that the federal government has been scrutinizing for more than five years," the Washington Post's editorial board opined on Wednesday.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

Smartphone texts are scrutinized for minute layers of meaning.

The New York Times - Books

The western is the genre most scrutinized for this evolution.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Balance sheets are scrutinized for signs of future problems.

The New York Times

Google Wallet, the mobile payments system for Android phones, was recently scrutinized for a security flaw.

The New York Times

His comments were immediately scrutinized for tone, and for what they didn't say.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "scrutinizing for", ensure that the context clearly indicates what specific elements or information are being sought. For better readability, consider using stronger synonyms like "examining" or "investigating" depending on the situation.

Common error

Avoid using "scrutinizing for" excessively in formal or academic writing. Opt for more precise and commonly accepted terms such as "analyzing", "assessing", or "investigating" to maintain a professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "scrutinizing for" functions as a verbal phrase indicating the action of examining something closely in search of specific details or information. While grammatically correct, Ludwig AI suggests it may sound awkward and offers alternatives for clearer communication.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

62%

Science

23%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Social Media

2%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "scrutinizing for" describes a careful examination in search of something specific. While grammatically sound, Ludwig AI indicates it can sound awkward and recommends alternatives like "examining in search of" for enhanced clarity. Usage is uncommon, primarily found in News & Media and Scientific contexts. When writing, be mindful of the context and audience, opting for more precise and fluent alternatives where appropriate. The provided examples illustrate its application, offering guidance for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

examining in search of

This alternative replaces "scrutinizing" with "examining" and emphasizes the purpose of the examination.

inspecting to find

This alternative uses "inspecting" which suggests a more formal and detailed examination, while "to find" clearly states the objective.

investigating for

This alternative is suitable when the examination is part of a formal inquiry or investigation.

checking for

This alternative is more informal and suggests a simpler, less rigorous examination.

vetting in order to discover

The word "vetting" indicates a thorough assessment for approval, and "in order to discover" highlights the goal of revealing something.

analyzing to detect

This alternative highlights the analytical aspect of the examination, with "to detect" suggesting the identification of specific elements.

observing in the hope of finding

This option specifies that the observation is for the goal of find something.

exploring in an attempt to locate

The use of "exploring" suggests a broader search, and "in an attempt to locate" conveys a sense of uncertainty in finding something.

reviewing in search of

This alternative suggests a formal assessment.

perusing for

This option indicates a quick assessment.

FAQs

What does "scrutinizing for" mean?

"Scrutinizing for" means to examine something closely and carefully, typically to discover something or search for potential errors or inconsistencies. It implies a detailed and critical inspection.

What can I say instead of "scrutinizing for"?

You can use alternatives like "examining for", "investigating for", or "checking for" depending on the context.

Is "scrutinizing for" grammatically correct?

While grammatically acceptable, "scrutinizing for" can sound somewhat awkward. It's better to use more common and direct alternatives such as "scrutinizing to find" or "scrutinizing in order to" to improve clarity.

How can I use "scrutinizing for" in a sentence?

You can use "scrutinizing for" in a sentence like this: "The auditors are scrutinizing for any discrepancies in the financial records." However, consider using a more fluent alternative like "The auditors are examining the financial records for any discrepancies."