Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
These women were excluded from the screening proportion calculations.
The control participation proportion (76%) was good, but the RDD screening proportion was low.
The estimated proportions of women screened by state state-level screening proportion ranged from 1.5 to 32.7 %, 0.001 to 22.4 %, and 5.0 % to 73.2 % in the 18 64, 18 39, and 40 64 years age groups, respectively.
Hence, one would expect that a screening strategy with age-dependent screening rate, i.e., treating screening proportion in the population as a function of age, would be more cost-saving than the strategies assuming a constant rate.
Our inability to define the race and ethnicity of some women in the study could result in an underestimate of the screening proportion for any given race or ethnic group.
Based on this baseline percentage, using an alpha value of 0.025 to adjust for the comparisons with two clinics, a sample of 500 individuals will result in power of 80% for a screening proportion in the smaller implementation clinic of 0.147 or higher and a sample of 1000 individuals will result in power of 80% or higher for a screening proportion of 0.132 in the larger clinic.
Similar(53)
This could result in an overestimate of the screening proportions.
Although cervical cancer screening proportions have increased over time, screening proportions among the uninsured still lag far behind those among women with private or public health insurance [ 5].
Screening proportions show the effect of the breast screening age range.
The CRC screening proportions in all Asian subgroups were lower than in NHW.
We assessed 3-year screening proportions by categories of BMI, age, sex, race/ethnicity, and baseline hypertension and (except for blood glucose screening) diabetes mellitus status.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com