Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
A further screening of the data sets defining the magnitude and phase responses of each function is performed by eliminating all data representing outliers in the 0·5 20 Hz frequency range.
On first screening of the data, we could not find indications for systematic differences between data from different NFIs, probably because we used the original diameter measurements without any further processing or interpretation.
Screening of the data for association was carried out using GenAbel (1).
Screening of the data set indicated that there were no obvious differences between those who completed and those who were lost to follow-up.
The second was to construct an accessible database in a format that permits extraction and screening of the data for any purpose (Additional files 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11: Tables S5 – S56).
Similar(55)
MB had primary responsibility for the psychological screening of the families, data collection, data entry, all analyses and writing the manuscript.
A more stringent screen of the data, requiring at least three fold change in expression in db/db GEC, reduced the list of genes to twenty two (Fig. 5).
Pre-screening of the data indicated that there were no significant main effects or interactions between novelty seeking score and subject sex, dominance rank, or the addition of new adult males to the group in the prior 6 months.
We observed that typically over 90%% of genes called differently expressed with microarray, even with a low stringency screen of the data (FC > 1.5), were independently confirmed with RNA-seq.
In total, 45 genes were identified as significantly changed, using a relatively low stringency screen of the data, with a p-value cutoff of <0.05, and fold change >2 (Table 3).
In the screening of phages, the data were normalized by the amounts of phages, which were quantified by ELISA for the FLAG-tag contained in the coat protein.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com