Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
49– 51 In recent years, prenatal or neonatal toxoplasmosis screening has been evaluated but not adopted in numerous countries in Europe, including the United Kingdom, Switzerland, and Denmark 50– 53; and in Canada and Israel.
Its core methodology has been previously published [ 1], and its self-controlled cohort analysis for temporal association screening has been evaluated by the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership as 'IC 1 Temporal Pattern Discovery' [ 8, 9, 16, 17].
Screening for breast cancers or colorectal cancers, with long doubling times, has been evaluated using the incidence method whereas lung cancer screening has been evaluated using the detection method only (Fletcher et al, 1993; Zappa et al, 2001).
Similar(57)
13 14 Several approaches for initial screening have been evaluated, but their findings have not been systematically reviewed and quantitatively synthesised, and it is not yet clear which test or combination is the most accurate.
Occasionally, the efficacy of screening for cancer recurrence has been evaluated by means of case-control studies.
The validity of the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) in geriatric rehabilitation has been evaluated in a research environment but not in professional practice.
MRI has been evaluated in screening for breast cancer in women with a genetic preposition but has been found to be expensive, costing EUR13 930 per detected cancer [ 6].
Microscopic Observation Drug Susceptibility (MODS) assay, is a direct rapid DST test which has been evaluated for MDR screening from clinical specimens.
This questionnaire has been evaluated as a screening tool for autism and found to predict autism with a sensitivity of 0.9 and specificity of 0.69.
Double reading has been evaluated in a recent systematic review which dedicated much space to mammography screening [57].
Only one SWAps has been evaluated independently.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com