Thus, the Gilpin model scored best (sensitivity BRCA1: 100%; sensitivity BRCA2: 88%, two families missed).
Percent correct response scores, sensitivity, and specificity values were computed for all variables.
The cutoff score, sensitivity, and specificity of the PHQ-9 determined in our study are consistent with the literature.
Indeed, the lack of score sensitivity to task variation is well documented in the language testing research.
Further research is needed to replicate the results presented here in new samples and to determine score sensitivity to change over time with flares and treatment.
After the calculation, commonly used statistical indicators related to classification are displayed, including number of positive samples, number of negative samples, AUC score, accuracy, MCC, F1 score, sensitivity, specificity and ROC curve.
The result table generated from this sub-module will give detailed information about the model, including classifier, parameter, number of positive samples, number of negative samples, AUC score, accuracy, MCC (Matthews correlation coefficient), F1 score, sensitivity, specificity and ROC curve.
The ability to correctly identify subjects with a severe CAC score (sensitivity) was 50% to 60% for an IMT of the internal or common carotid artery >80th percentile (internal carotid IMT ≥1.9 mm and common carotid IMT ≥1.04 mm).
PONS' cut off scores, sensitivity, and specificity was also computed.
