Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Numerical and continuous scoring of satisfaction ratings using a Likert-type scales may provide a high degree of precision, but it should be remembered that actual values may be small and that these are not intervals [ 71].
Similar(59)
Results: We showed that age, initial expectations, anxiety and depression was significantly related to the total score of satisfaction with hospital care.
Mean scores of satisfaction with patient care variety and opportunities for skill development and practice were consistent for both the 2- and the 4-week rotations (Table 4).
The average scores of Satisfaction with Life and Positive Affects reached high levels on the scale, as opposed to Negative Affects, appointing towards the maintenance of the SWB.
Table 2 displays the raw scores of satisfaction and reported experience for each predictor.
Concurrent validity was evaluated using the Spearman correlation between the global score of satisfaction generated from our instrument and the general score of satisfaction from the Client satisfaction Questionnaire [ 20].
Higher scores of satisfaction of services provisions were reported for courtesy and respect (95.80 %) followed by privacy (93.28 %).
The satisfaction scores were calculated for each scale, as well as the global score of satisfaction, which was based on all items.
A strong correlation of 0.68 (p < 0.001) was found between the global score of satisfaction and an independent measure of general satisfaction, the CSQ score (Cronbach's alpha of the CSQ score = 0.90).
Patient scores of satisfaction with certain aspects of healthcare proved hard to interpret, as the term satisfaction was not well defined and its simplicity did not acknowledge the multidimensional nature of satisfaction [ 4].
Finally, the variable of the CHWs' performance was generated by adding the score of the household visitation and the score of satisfaction, and categorized into five quintiles as: poorest (0), poor (1), moderate (2), high (3) and highest (4).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com