Sentence examples for scoring for information from inspiring English sources

The numbers of available categories probably influenced the scoring for information retention as the two highest scoring systems (CODAC and PSANZ-PDC) also had the greater numbers of available categories.

While three investigators were closely involved in the development of two of the systems tested (CODAC and PSANZ-PDC) and bias cannot be excluded, steps were taken to minimize this risk and exploration through subgroup analyses, examining scoring for information retention and ease of use, did not reveal any major concerns.

Maximum mean scores were given for parameters asking about the promptness of prescription medication service (2.99), and professionalism of the pharmacy staff (2.96) with the lowest being scored for information given to clients about the storage of medication (1.25), and explanations of possible side effects (1.27).

The SDS sub-score 'implementation' is the partial company disclosure score for information about the realization of strategic programs, as well as integration within firm-wide communication and incentive systems.

CODAC and PSANZ-PDC were the only classifications receiving satisfactory scores for information retention, across all sources of important information identified.

(ii) The Kuwaiti subscale scores for "information" and "types of intervention" tended to be lower than those from the five EPSILON sites.

ReCoDe received only one unsatisfactory score for information retention in the area of genetic testing which was shown to be one of the less frequent sources of important information.

The questionnaire also yielded two total scores for information need (i.e. regarding the contents and accessibility), both ranging from 0 to 18, equaling the number of health care services about which patients reported an information need (see Fig.  1).

The subscale score for "information" was significantly lower than those for "professionals' skills", "access", "relatives' involvement", "efficacy", and "overall satisfaction" (paired t ranged from 3.7 - 10.1, df = 129, P < 0.0001).

Total score for information need about contents decreased from 4.2 (SD 4.5) to 1.9 (SD 2.9; p < 0.01) and for accessibility from 3.6 (SD 4.5) to 1.4 (SD 2.4; p < 0.01) (paired t-tests).

The low scores for information systems are not surprising taking into account that the majority of the small practices in Switzerland lack electronic health records, registries and reminder systems.