Suggestions(1)
Exact(2)
There was an increase in number of participants who obtained excellent score (>85%) at post-test (84.1%) compared to pre-test (70.5%), while there were decreases in those scoring fair (50 69.99%) and good (70 84.99%).
"Algorithmic scoring, Fair and Isaac argued, was a more equitable, scientific alternative to this unfair reality".
Similar(58)
"We scored fair tries but another night the ball would have bounced the other way – we are not getting carried away," he added.
Therefore, criterion validity scored fair.
Thus internal consistency scored fair.
Five percent scored "fair," 3%% "insufficient," and 5%% "unsatisfactory".
The other 9 patients scored "satisfied"; 5 patients scored "fair" and 2 patients scored "poor".
Left knee scored fair and right knee scored poor according to Ikeuchi scale [ 3].
In the non-medial support group, 17 cases (62.9%) were scored excellent, seven cases (26.0%) were scored fair, and three cases (11.1%) were scored poor.
Comparing neck-shaft angle according to the presence of medial support at last follow-up, 32 cases (88.9%) were scored excellent and four cases(11.1%) were scored fair.
The overall satisfaction of the patients at the 12-month follow-up was "excellent" in 9 patients, while 4 patients scored "good". 1 patient scored "fair", and as joint degeneration progressed, he received a total knee arthroplasty 14 months postoperatively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com