Suggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The GI is the quotient of the sum of the values for all gingival surfaces of the scored teeth and the number of scored surfaces [ 36].
The modified Huddart/Bodenham score for a given model is described as the sum of the scored teeth, "total arch constriction score," with a range of the score −30 to +10.
Similar(58)
Table 2 presents the results of the repeated 39 images incorporated within the presentations for PWL images based on 3 different presentations: scoring obtained from only the left central incisor, the left lateral incisor, and the highest scored tooth regardless of tooth type.
Almost half of children (48%) scored their teeth as 2 or 3 on the index.
"All of the bone is scored with tooth picks, scratches and punctures, so it was an important resource," says Schreve. "And yes, they seem to be taking and consuming adult rhinos as well".
Table 4 Comparison of parameters between implant and space closure groups Recorded scores Tooth mobility (number of teeth) Probing depth (number of teeth) Infraocclusion (number of teeth) Plaque index (mean ± SD) TMD (mean ± SD) Implant group 1 12 14 3.1 ± 1.2 1.3 ± 1.1 OSC group 0 3 0 2.9 ± 1.1 1.5 ± 1.03 P value NS 0.001* 0.001* 0.632 0.605 *Level of significance set at P < 0.05.
However, this index is made for scoring tooth wear in general irrespective of its predominant aetiology.
Their teeth were thoroughly examined using the International Caries Detection & Assessment System ICDASS) criteria [ 43]. (ICDAS scores tooth status for presence of active caries as well as lesion severity).
Moreover, a statistically significant relationship was found between oral health knowledge scores, tooth brushing frequency and DMFT scores as well as gingival bleeding in the 12- to 15-year-olds.
A = Most common severe tooth scored (mode) B = Most severe tooth scored Different examiners using same test.
Children with one or more teeth scored as 'decayed' or 'filled with additional decay' were considered to have decayed teeth.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com