Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
The highest decrease in mean Tsui score (visit 2 vs baseline: −4.9) was achieved by patients in the laterocollis group in which 64.3% of the patients had reported pain at baseline vs 54.5% in the torticollis group.
Effect size: Mean change score (visit 2 to visit 10) divided by standard deviation of visit 2 score Measuring satisfaction with medication provides important outcome information from the patient's perspective as to their experience with the therapy and their willingness to ask their physician for the treatment.
Similar(57)
Change in all MRI structures and leg strength was calculated as: Visit-3 score – Visit-2 score.
Pairs of dependent variables were: arterial oxytocin concentrations (A1 and A2), cortisol concentrations (visit 1 and visit 2), as well as psychopathology scores, HAMD (visit 1 and visit 2), BDI-I (visit 1 and visit 2), STAI state (visit 1 and visit 2) and STAI trait scores (visit 1 and visit 2).
Murphy, 26, blundered in the fourth frame when he missed a black after putting together a run of 61, and Hendry cleared up in two scoring visits to pull clear.
The mean pain score at visit one was 4 (range, 0 8) and the mean pain score at visit 2 was 3 (range, 0 9).
After matching visits by propensity score, the visits having a nystagmus template remained substantially associated with documentation of a nystagmus assessment.
Please total your score and visit the section of Hall A where you scored the highest number of "D's".
Nevertheless, the average score in visit 2 was 3.2 and 38.1% of patients maintained moderate to high levels of severity.
Effect size, standardized response mean, and Guyatt's responsiveness statistic were calculated using BII and IPSS change scores (End-of-Study Visit score minus Visit 2 score) to compare the responsiveness, or the ability to detect change, of the 2 measures [ 20].
CRIS-CAT scores at Visit 1 were predictive of SF-12 PCS and MCS scores 1 year later.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com