Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
That's when you start talking about the field position, opportunity to score, percentages to score, things that most teams take very serious.
The research questions were answered using the quantitative descriptive statistical method that provides analysis of mean score, percentages, and frequency obtained by using Statistical Packages for Social Science Program (SPSS) version 24.0.
2) Score percentages (SP) of molecules associated with sensitivity to treatment are initially assigned a "+" sign (e.g. BRAF mutation V600E increases the efficacy of drug Sorafenib), whereas molecules associated with resistance to treatment are assigned a "−" sign (e.g. BRAF mutation V600E decreases the efficacy of drug Sorafenib).
Younger patients were more likely to have lower response rates and higher postoperative best score percentages.
An analysis of the preoperative best and worst score percentages for this population was also calculated.
Subscales analysis demonstrated that the OHS-FCS and OHS-PCS subscales produced postoperative best score percentages above the 15% postoperative best score percentage threshold.
Similar(51)
The overall mean score percentage seemed to be moderate at 69.5 ± 8.8%.
Finally, even though a long day care centre may receive a high score (percentage) from QIAS, it does not necessarily translate to high quality, compared with other measures.
3) At this point, an overall score (OS) can be calculated as the weighted average of the score percentage calculated for each informative molecule.
cProtein Score C.I.%: the PMF score percentage of protein sequence (Confidence interval: Protein Score C.I.% ≥ 95%).
Missing items: percentage of patients with any missing items; Missing score: percentage of patients with any missing score; Floor effect: percentage of patients with worst possible score (0); Ceiling effect: percentage of patients with best possible score (100).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com