Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
Quality score of this study was 67%.
Thus, the score of this study might be more representative, showing the level of the whole nation.
Thus, the anxiety score of this study was the sum of standard scores for question 1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 11, 15, 16, 19, and 20.
The methodological quality score of this study was 25%.
All 31 experts completed all three Delphi rounds, which resulted in a 100% response score of this study.
The reading spelling factor in the BATS/ ALSPAC datasets was the most comparable trait to the IQ-adjusted PC1 score of this study.
Similar(54)
Overall, the HLQ scores of this study could not be consistently related to the participants' self-reported experiences or reflections during the interviews.
The most important is that the comparison between the scores of this study and various national norms is a priori problematic since it is not age-adjusted and the study sample is not necessarily representative of the Greek general population.
The low quality score of the studies included in this meta analysis occurred as a result of a wide range of methodological weaknesses.
It is possible that especially non-responders have lower PAM scores, the responders of this study participants scored very high on the PAM and low levels of the PAM construct were rarely used.
The reason why HIS shows relationship with vascular factors and cognitive scores of this community study may be explained as follows; first, the study participants might include people with cognitive impairment of vascular origin.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com