Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
A working PH model with the five significant covariates as covariates is fitted to the midpoint imputed recurrence time data to derive a risk score of recurrence.
The risk score of recurrence is categorized into four groups by the quartiles and the dichotomous previous polyp history is directly used to represent the risk score of censoring.
Similar(10)
Four-month recurrence risk was 6%48%% across the score; the absolute risk of recurrence 4 months after the first CDI increased by approximately 5% for every 1-point increase in score.
The test measures the activity levels of various genes in the tumor and computes a score showing the risk of recurrence.
Receiver operating characteristics methodology [ 9] has been used to evaluate the ability of Fletcher's score in individuate risk of recurrence after resection, overall metastases, and death.
This is because the working PH model used to derive a risk score to summarize risk of recurrence based on the midpoint imputed data can be considered as misspecified.
We first observed a statistically significant association between a high PCR-GGI score and a higher risk of recurrence in ER-positive BC samples from patients that received adjuvant tamoxifen for primary disease across two different BC populations.
A recurrence score less than 18 was considered low risk of recurrence, a score greater than or equal to 31 was considered high risk of recurrence, and the remaining scores were considered intermediate risk of recurrence.
Furthermore, multiple studies have correlated the increased expression of these proteins with poor prognosis, higher Gleason scores and a lower incidence of recurrence free survival.
Patients with a total score <2.86 were assigned to the low risk of recurrence group and patients with a score ≥2.86 constituted the high risk of recurrence group.
There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding change in WOSI score, rate of recurrence, or rate of reoperation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com