Sentence examples for score of importance for from inspiring English sources

In addition, the question of the relative importance of the four types of responsibility was assessed in two ways: firstly by asking respondents to rate the importance of a series of five examples of each type of business responsibility, which was then averaged to give an overall score of importance for that responsibility, and secondly by a simple ranking of the four types of responsibility.

The unexpected finding that cortical excitability of the affected hemisphere increasing in tandem with an increase in cumulative penetration-aspiration scores, might be of importance for future directions of research.

We found, however, a statistical significant difference between the two groups for both knowledge scores: Mean difference of 0.4 (95% CI: 0.2 0.6) in the score for knowledge about EBM-resources and mean difference of 0.2 (95% CI: 0.0 0.3) in the score for conceptual knowledge of importance for critical appraisal.

RF indicates that all image features score lower than the 100th position of importance for the filtered case or after the 350th position for the unfiltered case.

Higher self-efficacy scores did not impact self-reported scores of importance placed on workplace empowerment.

For example, a score of 9 for importance minus a score of 6 for availability equaled a gap score of 3. We calculated confidence intervals at 95% for the mean scores of rated importance, availability, and corresponding gaps.

For example, we used the impact of human papilloma virus vaccine research [ 35, 36] as an example of a study that would be given a high score of nine for importance because of its global implications for prevention of a serious and prevalent disease.

If a factor was not mentioned, it was assigned an importance score of zero for all respondents in that group.

Health economics, health policy, environmental health and medical anthropology disciplines and their sub competencies were given a score of over 4 for importance and below 4 for performance.

The 51 DEsCRIBE™ questionnaire items were ranked by decreasing mean score (i.e., by order of importance) both for the whole sample and for GPs and psychiatrists separately.

We employed a paired t-test to examine the difference between 'overall' scores of clusters for importance and feasibility.