Exact(3)
Hence, the lower GOHAI score of disaster survivors particularly among the upper-middle age group, might be characteristic of victims from a disaster area.
In contrast to our expectations, our findings, based on the pooled R squares, indicate that a sum score of disaster experiences did not improve the prediction of mental health problems compared to single disaster factors: they were almost equal.
Then the evaluation model of hospital disaster resilience can be established, and the overall level of hospital disaster resilience (F) can be calculated using the model as below: F = 0.615 F 1 + 0.202 F 2 + 0.103 F 3 + 0.080 F 4. The overall score of disaster resilience (F) for each hospital of this study can be calculated accordingly with their relative rank are listed as Table 3.
Similar(57)
As a result, it was found that in the study sample, the score of hospital disaster management mechanism (F2) was relatively lower than the other three factors with less than 50% of hospitals having positive scores.
So from a position of disaster, not scoring points, you could have scored points and maybe one more lap could have been enough to do what we were thinking and change the wing.
It's exactly the kind of end-of-season-review-bloopers-reel goal you'd have expected Schalke, the masters of disaster, to score … at the other end.
Our results indicated that postnatal women in Miyagi prefecture's coastal area had a remarkably higher prevalence of EPDS score of ≥9 after the disaster.
Degree of disaster exposure (sum score) and some disaster-related experiences (such as house destroyed, injured, confusion) were related to distress at waves 2 and 3.
Table 4 presents the results of analyses with respect to the relation between the degree of disaster exposure (sum-score) and symptoms of PTSD.
The degree of disaster exposure (sum-score) was related to a higher number of symptoms of PTSD at wave 2 (B = 2.23, SE = 0.19) and wave 3 (B = 2.19, SE = 0.20) (model 1).
The degree of disaster exposure (sum-score) was significantly associated with symptoms of distress at wave 2 (B = 5.43, SE = 0.65) and wave 3 (B = 5.16, SE = 0.68) (model 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com