Sentence examples for score in differentiating from inspiring English sources

To evaluate the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph III (HRT III) glaucoma probability score in differentiating normal from pathologic eyes and to compare the glaucoma probability score with Moorfields regression analysis (MRA).

A study by Prosen et al. showed there is significant difference in modified Boston criteria for HF score between cardiac (mean 10.9 ± 1.8) and pulmonary (4.6 ± 1.2) patients [19], while in our study, it showed little difference in scores between cardiac (mean 8.07 ± 1.3) and non-cardiac group (6.86 ± 1.15), questioning the reliability of score in differentiating HF from non-cardiac causes.

The sensitivity and specificity of the Oximetry Score in differentiating exacerbation onset from day-to-day symptom variation is reported in Table 5.

The HAP score validated well with the independent dataset and performed better than other scoring systems in differentiating high- and low-risk groups.

The sensitivity and specificity for each value of each test were calculated to assess the accuracy of the clinical scoring system in differentiating between advanced and mild fibrosis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed by plotting the sensitivity against (1 - specificity) at each value.

Tomosynthesis and radiography scored as equal in differentiating between demineralization and osteolysis around the cup and stem in 29 of 40 cases (72%, Table 1).

If ROC analysis is conducted in all patients, including patients with OCBs and without OCBs, the AUC value of ECL score against myelin particles in differentiating MS from non‐MS is 0.799 with a 95% CI interval from 0.740 to 0.857.

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of gray-scale US features, CDFI pattern, VTI score, and SWV value in differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules were compared with chi-square statistics.

Partin et al. evaluated the capability of PSAvel in predicting relapse after RP and found that it turns out to be of some help to combine data relative to PSAvel, Gleason score, and pathological staging in differentiating locoregional recurrence from distant metastases [ 53].

The low inter-rater reliability reported for the individual muscle groups may therefore mainly reflect the difficulty in differentiating between score 4 and score 5 [ 9].

There was no statistically significant (p = 0.056 to p = 0.94) difference among the domains of the WORC and RC-QOL and the total scores of all measures in differentiating between surgical and non-surgical groups.