Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
On average, uninsured patients have a higher score for severity of illness.
SAPSII is a reliable score for severity assessment in septic patients and is therefore frequently used to stratify patients in clinical studies [23].
A summary histological score for severity of inflammation was accounted as summary of all the parameters.
It also correlated with the Wagner score for severity of foot ulceration.
The estimated coefficients of the patients' values for these variables were added together to form a prognostic score for severity of disease.
They showed also a negative association with the SOFA score for severity, as also did CD74 and HLA-C (P < 0.05, r ≤ (-0.5)).
Similar(53)
Higher scores indicate greater symptoms on that scale; recommended cut-off scores for severity labels (normal, moderate, severe and extremely severe) are given in the DASS manual.
In this study, patients with definite or severe AD had higher scores for severity of tiredness, as measured by the ESAS.
In the Brody II scoring system [34], bronchiectasis and peribronchial thickening are scored for severity and extent (central to peripheral lung).
Severity and extension of each pathologic finding were scored for severity as 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (marked) and for extension as 0 (absent), 1 (>0% and ≤25%), 2 (>25% and ≤50%), and 3 (>50%).
In the Maffessanti scoring system [25], bronchiectasis and bronchial wall thickening are scored for severity and extent (central, intermediate, to peripheral lung), and then the percentage of regional involvement is assessed both for the bronchial score and for the parenchyma score.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com