Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
The most useful cut-off values were calculated by identification of the highest score for sensitivity and specificity.
The composite score for sensitivity and specifity, as determined by AUROC in our study, was equivalent to the originally described score (0.82 vs. 0.81, respectively).
This study will estimate the cost-effectiveness in terms of cost per additional high risk individual identified and the cost utility using the SF-6D administered at baseline and 6 months[ 35] to estimate the cost per QALY over the trial period (with use of 2 week score for sensitivity analysis, if 6 month score not available).
Plates were incubated at 30° for 2−3 d to allow for cell growth and were then replica-plated to plates containing YPD, YPD + 15mM caffeine, YPD + 3% formamide, and YPD + 150 mM hydroxyurea media, and incubated at 30° to score for sensitivity to caffeine, formamide, and hydroxyurea.
Similar(56)
The original version showed scores for sensitivity between 86% and 100% and a 85% specificity for SFD according to DSM-IV criteria, as well as a good test-retest reliability and correlation of the number of self-reported symptoms with the number of symptoms yielded by a structured interview [ 14].
Participants who died were imputed with a zero score for all sensitivity analyses.
We also reported the cut-off score for optimal sensitivity and specificity based on our findings.
Scoring higher for sensitivity than specificity may be interpreted that the health workers tend to over diagnose; that is any person attending hospital is likely to be labelled as being sick.
19 In order to test the US scoring set for sensitivity to change under different kind of treatments according to the OMERACT filter, correlations were performed between different variables such as CRP, ESR, DAS28 at each visit and each US subdomain (synovitis and tenosynovitis in GSUS and PDUS, and erosions in GSUS).
In addition, a set of YPD replica plates was incubated at 14° to score for cold-sensitivity.
This score was evaluated for sensitivity and specificity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com