Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(15)
After a selection process, a score for risk estimation was constructed.
The score for risk in the clinical sample was significantly higher in men.
One half of the incident cases of type 2 diabetes were missed by using high metabolic score for risk prediction.
The mean score for risk comprehension was 8.25 for the ISDM group and 2.62 for control group (mean difference 5.63 (4.82 to 6.44); p<0.001).
The chronic disease score improved prediction of infection by the NNIS risk index and augmented the ASA score for risk adjustment.
Patients were grouped according to whether they lacked AKI or had AKI (based on RIFLE score for risk, injury and/or failure) within 48 hours following admission.
Similar(45)
A score for risk-identification purposes should have a satisfying predictive ability in the target population, and it should use data that are clinically readily available.
Commonly used scores for risk prediction after trauma include ISS and the RTS [ 2].
The PIRO score is superior to the MEDS and APACHE II scores for risk stratification, and its prognostic value is similar to MEDS and APACHE II scores.
In addition to clinical scores for risk stratification in the ED, several blood biomarkers have been put forward in ED patients for improved risk stratification [ 6– 9].
The relationship between risk factors and the instruments calculating scores for risk factors and coronary revascularization is important for clinical providers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com