Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
One individual reported a decline in score for research factors (3, table 2).
Activity in each domain is converted to points, which are used to calculate a score for research output.
The dependant variable was the mean response score for personal factors nested within survey number and individuals (random effects) with mean response score for research factors as the predictor.
Activity in each domain is converted to points, which are used to calculate a score for research output that allows comparisons: (a) within an organizational unit, for example from year to year, or (b) in the same year between organizational units (e.g. research teams, wards, departments, and hospitals).
Similar(56)
During scoring, for research purposes, we scored students for evidence of difficulties in an all-or-none manner.
As a proxy for the level of "attractiveness" towards specific research areas or topics, we determined Attraction Scores for research areas or topics.
8 To address research question 5, the mean response scores for personal factors within surveys and individuals were compared with the scores for research factors using a three-level mixed effects regression model.
Average performance scores for research design and implementation were usually over four points (over a seven point scale), except for qualitative study design and use of qualitative research tools.
The CHNRI methodology for setting priorities in health research investments Research priority scores for many research investment options may change based on different contexts so specifying the context a priori is a critical part of the CHNRI process.
Further studies are required to validate the score for clinical research use, especially in outdoor living horses and ponies.
What is missing from the current scoring tool is a system that assigns a numeric score to each subaction and thus enables the calculation of a total score for each research use domain.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com