Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(34)
As the final week of France's financial trial of the century opens today, the running score appears to favour the five-billion-euro man, Jérôme Kerviel.
This score appears to be able to identify patients with a poor prognosis, independently of the type of HM.
Although their accuracy score appears to increase as the time spent to respond increases, the average accuracy of naive adversaries remained below 2.7%%.
While the earnings-estimates score appears to work well for broad indices like the S&P 1500, its effectiveness varies greatly from sector to sector.
While the effect of different ordering on accuracy score is insignificant for all adversary types, the legitimate user's accuracy score appears to be affected positively by ordering [Q2‐Q3‐Q1] and [Q3‐Q2‐Q1].
The purpose of this analysis is not to compare the countries; nonetheless, the overall score appears to show that China tops the 11 participating countries, followed by Japan and Indonesia.
Similar(26)
Moreover, as undocumented and as unrealistic as the petitioners' fears on this score appear to be, the Board nonetheless included provisions in its orders to calm this concern.
However, England's score appeared to be 15-20 runs below par on a sound batting pitch.
Therefore, the delay of releasing the score appeared to play a meaningful part in helping the participants to engage and concentrate in self-correction.
In this subgroup of 153 patients, the MACOCHA score appeared to be the only predictive factor for DI (OR per point = 1.47, 95 % CI [1.23 1.75]).
SOFA score appeared to be a reliable prognostic tool in this subset of patients.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com