Sentence examples for scope of consent from inspiring English sources

Accordingly, it is not a definable, quantifiable substance around which a scope of consent can be built.

Instead, ERBs require the scope of consent to be circumscribed to a particular research area, while remaining linked to ongoing oversight in actual research uses.

When designing rules regarding the scope of consent, the legislator must seek to approach the subject of consent in terms of definable, quantifiable features.

ERBs delimited the scope of consent, particularly by requiring subsequent ethics approval of projects applying for the use of tissue and data from PSI.

A range of arguments based on consideration of harms to other parties could be put forward as an alternative justification for limiting the scope of consent; to protect against 'uncertainty' and 'possible future harm' as such.

Reasons for incomplete resection included cervical disease or likely adenomyosis 22/35 (63%); beyond the scope of consent 8/35 (22%); or beyond the skill of staff 5/35 (15%).

It also argues that user consent for use of personal data "need not always be express, affirmative consent" and that the scope of consent-based options that are offered to users should correlate with the "scale, scope, and sensitivity of the personal data that organizations collect, use, or disclose".

Issues include the need for parental consent, the scope of parental consent and the duty to recontact young adults, and the right of a child to assent or dissent.

There are exceptions and complications to the rule, including the scope of the consent given, whether the consent is voluntarily given, and whether an individual has the right to consent to a search of another's property.

This dilemma can place researchers in a difficult position, as they have drafted the consent form in the first place, and it would be tempting to interpret the scope of the consent rather broadly, especially as contacting participants to gain additional consent ('re-consenting') can be a costly and time-consuming task that may also inconvenience research participants unnecessarily.

It is the task of the trier of fact to determine the scope of the consent and to decide whether and to what extent the interception exceeded that consent".); In re Pharmatrack, Inc., 329 F.3d at 19 ("Thus, a reviewing court must inquire into the dimensions of the consent and then ascertain whether the interception exceeded those boundaries".) (internal quotation marks omitted).