Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
However, there were no group differences for interference effects to positive words on the emotional Stroop task or for interconnectedness of positive interpersonal content in this study.
There is scope for this.
Plenty of scope for executive gaffes there.
The scope for improvement is clear.
There is plenty of scope for improvement.
There is still scope for variation.
But there is little scope for growth.
Is there scope for unilateral gestures?
There's scope for movement here.
But the scope for disaster remains considerable.
I can see the scope for Malaysia.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com