Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
An obvious side effect of the length of the book is the increase in the scope for inaccuracies and already out-of-date scientific statements.
Similar(59)
Most scopes have windage and elevation knobs which can be turned to compensate for inaccuracies.
It carries apologies for inaccuracies virtually every week.
Too often the original person who broke the story then gets trashed for inaccuracies.
The software must compensate for inaccuracies in mechanical stage positioning.
There is scope for this.
There is still scope for variation.
But there is little scope for growth.
Is there scope for unilateral gestures?
Plenty of scope for executive gaffes there.
The scope for improvement is clear.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com