Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
What's Ahead for Early-Career Scientists? 1 February 2008 A comprehensive biennial examination finds opportunities far brighter in industry than in academe.
Who Speaks for Early-Career Scientists? 1 June 2007 In the current discussion about raising the cap on the number of foreign technical and scientific workers, the voices of the Americans most directly affected are going largely unheard.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announces a new review process for certain gain-of-function (GOF) experiments with the avian influenza A (H7N9) virus, some of which are proposed this week by influenza scientists (1).
And more specifically, how can the numbers of women and other underrepresented groups be increased to match their numbers in the ranks of research scientists? 1 In this article, current and former editors of bioscience journals comment on the editorial review process, describe how editors and reviewers are chosen, and offer concrete suggestions on how to get involved in editorial review.
Tech Jobs: These include data scientists (#1), solutions architects (#3), mobile developer (#5).
Genomics Portals platform was designed around the three conceptual problems faced daily by biomedical scientists: 1. Characterizing experimentally derived gene lists in the context of relevant publicly accessible genomics data (>82,000 genome scale data vectors; more than 1.8 billion data points).
Similar(51)
However, the filtration method is widely practiced among metagenomic scientists [ 1, 2, 22], serving as an appropriate method for collection of microbial-size organisms and particles in the seawater.
Among those 10,356 scientists, 98.4% endorsed the consensus.
For every 100 applications from black scientists, 16 were financed.
The instrument took the scientists 12 years to develop.
In an Adventure with Scientists (£16.4m) and Snow White and the Huntsman (£15.7m).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com