Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
"scientific thoroughness" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing someone or something that has a deep knowledge of scientific facts and is conscientious in their work. For example, "Mary has a great deal of scientific knowledge, but her scientific thoroughness is what makes her a valuable asset to our team."
Exact(2)
Not only is basic research the cradle of future applications, it acts also directly as an institutional visiting card for customers to show scientific thoroughness.
What strikes me is, when applied to literature, how close this is to what I was brought up to call Practical Criticism of the IA Richards school - the assumption that understanding literature is enhanced by breaking it down into its constituent parts and analysing these with scientific thoroughness.
Similar(58)
Moreover, in the scientific research, thoroughness of review of previous knowledge is an "axiom", where it is insufficient to rely on user's interests and concepts.
Rigorously referenced and clearly written, Williams' hallmarks are thoroughness, scientific basis, and practical applicability for the obstetrician at the bedside.
It was widely praised, as were all her books, for its remarkable combination of scientific accuracy and thoroughness with an elegant and lyrical prose style.
The symposium's faculty judges evaluate participants on a range of criteria, including creativity, scientific thought, engineering goals, and thoroughness, Hsueh said.
The chapter goes on to summarize the mean characteristics that these engines should have in order to serve the complexity of scholarly information and the thoroughness of the scientific community.
His level of thoroughness, a result of his years of rigorous scientific training, is also hard to surpass".
For clinical trialists, knowing that the dataset will be available to others might ensure that data and analyses are gathered, curated, and archived with greater thoroughness; the temptation to report results selectively should be reduced; and scientific misconduct should be less likely.
This tactic was pursued with considerable thoroughness by the Austrian-born British philosopher Karl Popper (1902 92), whose views about scientific reasoning probably had more influence on practicing scientists than those of any other philosopher.
Despite its apparent thoroughness, Anderson's book mostly lacks a presentation of the technical-scientific-mathematical-logical side of Peirce's thought.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com