The phrase "scientific speech" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to a style of communication that is characterized by clarity, precision, and adherence to scientific terminology and conventions.
Example: "In academic settings, it is essential to use scientific speech to convey complex ideas effectively."
Alternatives: "technical language" or "scholarly discourse."
"One can expound as much as one likes in scientific speeches about his mythical and universal nature, but one always gets back to the fact that Tarzan is a half-naked guy saving white-skinned young women, lost in the jungle and wearing their party dresses, from the claws of vicious gorillas," noted Libération, the newspaper, in its review of the exhibition.
When Albert Einstein died in 1955 in Princeton, N.J., he left behind several thousand documents, including letters, scientific manuscripts, speeches and political writings.
This is no empty statement; the nonprofit institute has been at the forefront of scientific research on speech, language and literacy for decades.
Phonology, the study of phonemes, is distinct from phonetics, the scientific study of speech production.
Scientific and free speech groups cried foul.
A study last year in the journal Emotion showed that speaking in what is called a "minor third" -- a musical term for what gives songs that "sad" feeling -- can also work for speech, Scientific American reported.
Although based on scientific facts, his speeches are deliberately exaggerated with hyperbole and dark humour to give riders a sense of intimidation while preparing for Oblivion.
Issues of free scientific inquiry and free speech, as well as parsing of the word fraudulent would likely dominate the proceedings.
A poem by Frank Lebby Stanton: It doesn't matter what they preadh, Of high or low degree; The Old Hell of the Bible, Is Hell enough for me... ...... Hell-words taken from Dr. L. W. Merryweather's "American Speech," a scientific study of the word "hell".
In recent months a sustained campaign by the media, NGOs, foreign commentators and some scientists has seemingly convinced many that English law is uniquely draconian, a massive threat to free speech and scientific debate, that it has no proper public interest defence, doesn't protect expressions of opinion and that, as a result, London is infested with libel tourists.
