scientific misconduct

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "scientific misconduct" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It refers to actions that violate ethical principles and standards in scientific research. Example: The prominent researcher was found guilty of scientific misconduct after his colleagues discovered he had falsified data in his published studies.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But were the researchers guilty of any scientific misconduct?

The New York Times - Science

It set off six separate official inquiries, all of which cleared the researchers of scientific misconduct.

The New York Times - Science

But Dr. Dahlberg, of the Office of Research Integrity, said: "Missing data is not scientific misconduct.

The New York Times - Science

They called for the establishment of independent expert committees to investigate claims of scientific misconduct.

The Economist

"This is a flagrant example of scientific misconduct," Dr. Fang said.

The New York Times - Science

In a later interview with Dr. Monnett, investigators said they were looking into "scientific misconduct".

The New York Times

The office "investigates allegations of scientific misconduct by following the facts wherever they lead," she wrote.

The New York Times

"I think this reuse is not a scientific misconduct," Dr. Mori wrote.

The New York Times - Science

The Russell review has rejected all claims of serious scientific misconduct.

The Guardian - Opinion

A federal appeals panel later dismissed charges of scientific misconduct against the author of the report.

The New York Times

Which worked out in his case; he was busted for scientific misconduct.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing "scientific misconduct", be specific about the type of misconduct involved (e.g., fabrication, falsification, plagiarism) to provide clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Don't assume all cases of "scientific misconduct" are equal in severity or impact. Differentiate between minor errors and deliberate fraud to maintain accurate and fair assessments.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "scientific misconduct" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It identifies and names specific unethical actions that breach the integrity of scientific research. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a commonly used term to describe such actions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

44%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

16%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "scientific misconduct" is a commonly used noun phrase that refers to unethical behavior in scientific research, as verified by Ludwig AI. It encompasses actions like fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. The phrase is most frequently found in scientific and news media contexts, indicating its relevance in both research and public discourse. While it is grammatically correct and widely accepted, specific identification of the type of misconduct is crucial for clarity. Alternatives include "research misconduct" and "research fraud".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

research misconduct

A more generic equivalent to "scientific misconduct" that applies more widely.

scientific fraud

Equivalent to "scientific misconduct", with the word fraud highlighting the deception involved.

research fraud

Refers specifically to fraudulent practices within research activities.

academic dishonesty

Broader term that includes plagiarism, cheating, and other unethical academic behaviors.

falsification of results

Emphasizes the manipulation of research outcomes.

data fabrication

Focuses on the act of creating or inventing data.

breach of research integrity

Highlights the violation of honest and reliable research practices.

ethical violation in research

Highlights the breach of ethical principles during the research process.

dishonest science

An alternative which has a more informal tone.

negligence in research

Emphasizes the lack of due care and diligence in conducting research.

FAQs

How is "scientific misconduct" defined?

"Scientific misconduct" generally refers to fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. It's a serious breach of ethical standards in the scientific community.

What are some alternatives to the phrase "scientific misconduct"?

You can use alternatives like "research fraud", "research misconduct", or "academic dishonesty" depending on the specific context.

What are the consequences of "scientific misconduct"?

The consequences can range from retraction of publications and loss of funding to damage to reputation and legal penalties. Serious cases may lead to termination of employment or even criminal charges.

Is unintentional error considered "scientific misconduct"?

No, unintentional errors or differences of opinion are generally not considered "scientific misconduct". The key element is intent; misconduct involves deliberate or reckless disregard for established standards.