scientific justification for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "scientific justification for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the rationale or reasoning based on scientific evidence for a particular claim, action, or decision. Example: "The researchers provided a scientific justification for their hypothesis, citing numerous studies that supported their findings."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The scientific justification for it, however, is new.

The New York Times

There is no scientific justification for prejudice and discrimination, ever.

The Guardian

Ridley provides what he claims is a scientific justification for unregulated business.

The Guardian - Opinion

Last autumn the Science and Technology Committee of MPs found no scientific justification for lowering the limit.

The Guardian

If this all sounds like scientific justification for afternoon naps, long showers, and Russian literature, you're right.

The New Yorker

Japan has so far failed to convince the IWC that there is any scientific justification for the annual whale hunts.

The Guardian

To date there is no concrete scientific justification for prohibiting the use of this additive in Canada.

The Economist

Eventually Abu Ghazaleh was given the go-ahead to organise a conference in Cairo to help explain the scientific justification for allowing vacuum packs containing liquid into Egypt.

The Guardian

In Algeria he discovered "racism with scientific pretensions" and found that French psychiatrists there were willing to provide scientific justification for torture as a peace-keeping tool.

The Guardian - Books

The Public Accounts Committee also condemned the suspension of flights between Britain and the affected area, saying there had been "no scientific justification" for the ban.

Independent

That is a powerful symbol because there is apparently no clear scientific justification for the site, according to the consultative parties who authorise these research stations, supposedly on the sole criterion of scientific benefit.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Be precise when using "scientific justification for" in your writing. Indicate the exact scope to which scientific finds support the argument. Being accurate prevents any misinterpretations or overstatements.

Common error

Avoid claiming "scientific justification for" something when the evidence is preliminary, inconclusive, or based on a single study. Clearly indicate the limitations of the scientific support.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "scientific justification for" functions as a noun phrase, acting as the subject or object of a sentence. It indicates the reasoning or basis, rooted in scientific principles, behind a particular claim, action, or decision. Ludwig examples showcase its use in diverse fields, confirming its broad applicability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

52%

News & Media

47%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "scientific justification for" is a noun phrase that signals scientific backing for an action, claim, or decision. According to Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used in formal and scientific contexts, especially in areas like science and news media. The phrase indicates a reasoned explanation or defense supported by empirical evidence and logical reasoning. When using this phrase, ensure that the scientific support is clearly articulated and accurately represents the available evidence. You can use similar phrases like "scientific basis for", "scientific rationale for", or "scientific evidence for" depending on the specific shade of meaning you want to convey. Remember to avoid overstating the scientific support.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

scientific basis for

Replaces "justification" with "basis", emphasizing the fundamental scientific support.

scientific rationale for

Substitutes "justification" with "rationale", highlighting the logical scientific reasoning behind something.

scientific evidence for

Focuses on the concrete "evidence" that supports a claim, rather than the abstract concept of justification.

scientific grounds for

Uses "grounds" to indicate the scientific foundation or basis for something.

scientific support for

Replaces "justification" with "support", emphasizing the backing provided by scientific findings.

scientific backing for

Similar to "scientific support", but with a slightly stronger emphasis on endorsement or validation.

evidence-based rationale for

Combines the concepts of evidence and rationale, highlighting that the reasoning is based on concrete evidence.

research-based justification for

Emphasizes that the justification is derived from research findings.

scientific validation of

Focuses on the act of confirming or proving something using scientific methods.

scientific substantiation of

Highlights the act of providing evidence to support or prove the truth of something scientifically.

FAQs

How do you provide a "scientific justification for" a claim?

Providing a "scientific justification for" a claim involves presenting empirical evidence, research findings, and established scientific principles that support the claim. This may include citing relevant studies, explaining the underlying mechanisms, and addressing potential counterarguments.

What's the difference between "scientific justification for" and "scientific basis for"?

While both phrases are similar, "scientific justification for" implies a reasoning or argument supported by science, whereas "scientific basis for" suggests a foundational element or underlying principle rooted in science. The former is often used in the context of defending a decision or action, while the latter describes the fundamental science behind something.

When is it appropriate to use "scientific justification for" in a sentence?

It's appropriate to use "scientific justification for" when you want to explain why a particular action, decision, or belief is supported by scientific evidence. For example, "The study provides a "scientific justification for" the new treatment protocol."

What is an alternative to "scientific justification for" that still conveys a similar meaning?

Alternatives include "scientific rationale for", "scientific evidence for", or "scientific support for". Each of these phrases can be used to emphasize the scientific backing behind a claim or action.