Sentence examples for scientific efficacy from inspiring English sources
The phrase "scientific efficacy" is correct and usable in written English
It can be used when discussing the effectiveness or performance of a scientific method, treatment, or intervention. Example: "The researchers conducted a thorough analysis to determine the scientific efficacy of the new drug in treating the disease."
Is it possible that, despite their proven scientific efficacy, we take too many prescribed pills?
Any early termination decision, especially in trials where patients agree to biopsies for research purposes only, must have scientific, efficacy, or safety justification.
For a scientific efficacy confirmation of drug candidates or other medical interventions, statistical testing is performed to identify significant differences between test groups.
It is our premise that closing on-going clinical trials without scientific, efficacy, or safety justification is an abhorrent affront to all participants in clinical research as well as a fundamental betrayal of the trust that motivates patient participants to enroll in clinical trials.
When treating acne scarring and PIE, desperation to address the problem and obtain clear skin can lead to following destructive advice without proper citations of scientific efficacy.
The present research compares randomly selected 20-year-old men who took part in a scientific trial (efficacy) with those who voluntarily sought an intervention (effectiveness).
Using network theory and already established protocols and scientific knowledge, efficacy networks can be developed to guide drug development as well as the establishment of combination regimens, increasing the possibility of positive patient response and providing more reliable clinical tools for indicating disease state and treatment efficiency.
As other countries have found many years ago, the government must become more involved in pricing and financing of health care services, together with a more rigorous process of assessing services based on scientific evidence, efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
Existing measures that may be useful for testing this model and for which validity and reliability information is available include: the Project Ownership Survey (Hanauer and Dolan, 2014), scientific self-efficacy and scientific identity scales (Chemers et al., 2011; Estrada et al., 2011); and the self-authorship items from the Career Decision Making Survey (Creamer et al., 2010).
These four products were selected because of their relatively common use and ease of access in the greater Toronto area, as well as to allow comparison of products with a relatively high level of scientific evidence of efficacy and products with a relatively low level of scientific evidence of efficacy.
But before any theory is rejected as fraudulent practice, there should be a clear consensus among medical professionals that the method lacks scientific validity and efficacy.
