Another approach to addressing reproducibility are Reproducibility Initiatives (RIs), well-intended, high-profile, systematically peer-vetted initiatives that are intended to replace the traditional process of scientific self-correction.
The proposal is to make them available free after six months.In this section A hall of mirrors Reading the invisible Your inflexible friend From Russia, with love Correction: scientific publishing Reprints Related items Scientific publishing: Creative destruction in the libraryJun 29th 2006.
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/13/148/prepub We thank Professor David H van Thiel from the division of liver disease, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA for his kind scientific suggestions and corrections.
Funding agencies, publishers and researchers need to set strict C&R policies that would allow rapid revealation and correction of scientific errors instead of giving birth to new scientific projects and clinical trials based on erroneous results.
Therefore, there remains a lack of consensus within the scientific community regarding whether corrections for multiple comparisons are applicable.
Hung: Fieldwork and data collection, datamanagement Tran Q. Binh: Fieldwork and data collection, datamanagement, logistics and local scientific supervision, review and corrections of manuscript.
TTTN: Fieldwork and data collection, laboratory tests, data management PTG: Fieldwork and data collection, data management LQH: Fieldwork and data collection, data management TQB: Fieldwork and data collection, data management, logistics and local scientific supervision, review and corrections of manuscript.
Though it is a good reading and loaded with quality scientific information, some minor corrections may be incorporated as follow: The writing may be improved at some places such as, in second line of abstract "A recent development" should be "Recent developments".
Below I list some of the changes made or requested by gatekeepers that can make the text harder instead of easier to understand. 1. Edits to improve "good scientific English style": the corrections can introduce unfortunate word choices, jargon, undefined or unneeded abbreviations, and other technical editing errors.
