The phrase "scientific assumption" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it in any context where you are referring to an educated guess based on scientific research. For example: Scientists make scientific assumptions to explain the cause of certain phenomena, such as changes in weather patterns.
On the rock-solid scientific assumption that present trends will persist, The Economist calculates that turkeys will be as big as humans in just 150 years.
On the fairly scientific assumption that present trends will persist, The Economist estimates that turkeys will be big as humans in just 150 years.
Rote learning is common, and scientific ideas are often presented as 'inherited facts' without providing enough opportunities for students to develop deeper insights into the reasons for regarding a scientific assumption to be true.
Experimental carcinogenesis research is based on the scientific assumption that agents causing cancer in animals will have similar effects in humans (NTP 2002).
To do this, however, is not to justify any particular scientific assumptions.
Meetings of the Royal Astronomical Society were often enlivened by dramatic clashes between Eddington and Sir James Hopwood Jeans or Edward Arthur Milne over the validity of scientific assumptions and mathematical procedures.
But by that time, economic philosophy was so mired in Newtonian mechanical metaphors that its practitioners were unable to part with these theories, even though they were based on scientific assumptions that were largely inapplicable to economic practice.
In point of fact, particular scientific assumptions get their justification, if anywhere, when a move is made from a narrower to a more comprehensive science; what is assumed in geology, for example, may be proved in physics.
www.betterplace.com Sector 1 - Energy generation Sector 2 - Biofuels Employees: 25 If BioGasol is correct in its scientific assumptions and predictions, it could be making bioethanol as a fuel for about half the current price (after taxes) of petrol in the US.
An RRI perspective will allow for asking foundational questions regarding methods and scientific assumptions, and philosophy of science comes into view more easily compared to ELSA approaches.
Those who argue that psychiatry and the rest of medicine are inevitably normative do not infer from this that medicine is always biased; instead, their view is that the nature of psychiatric classification requires that some normative rather than purely scientific assumptions be made about what counts as health and what counts as illness.
