Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
But the real problem is that psychology, and no doubt many other sciences, does not police itself.
Secondly, given that Dyson applied this to the sciences, does it also apply in a field known to be a blend of science and engineering?
In the case of this study site, a potential conflict between the two stakeholder groups' viewpoints (those of MEXT and content course faculty members in mathematics and earth sciences) does not seem to be a major issue of concern.
This does not imply that that the introduction of open source in the life sciences does not have any potential as a 'defense of the public domain' or as a new kind of commons that is noncommercial (see Lessing 2001 Benkler 2002 2006 see Boyle 2003a 2003b 2008).
It's not that there can't be other philosophical subjects, there is religious philosophy, and ethical philosophy, and political philosophy, plenty of stuff for the philosophers to do, but the frontier of the physical sciences does not appear to be among them.
Yet to the best of our knowledge, a search engine technology that searches and cross-links all different data types in life sciences does not exist.
Similar(53)
Science doesn't sleep!
Apparently science does matter.
Science does not assume.
Science doesn't work that way.
Political science does not offer much help.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com