Sentence examples for sciences consulting from inspiring English sources

The 77,000 number comes from an 82-page report on the proposed rule prepared in 2015 for the National Mining Association NMAA) by Ramboll Environ, an environmental, safety and health sciences consulting firm.

She recently joined the Halloran Consulting Group, based in Waltham, Massachusetts, which specializes in life sciences consulting.

Michael Peterson is a board-certified toxicologist at Gradient, an environmental and risk sciences consulting firm.

Michael K. Peterson, a senior toxicologist with the environmental and risk sciences consulting firm Gradient who was retained by the Recycled Rubber Council to study synthetic turf, cautioned against rushing to conclusions based on anecdotal evidence like Griffin's list.

Membrane filtration, including reverse osmosis, is a proven way to remove the majority of chemicals, but it is energy-intensive and expensive, says Jean Debroux, a scientist/engineer with the San Francisco based engineering and environmental sciences consulting firm Kennedy/Jenks.

For a critical discussion of whether the concept of understanding without recourse to empathy is useful for marking an epistemic distinction between the human and natural sciences consult also Stueber 2012b).

In the environmental science consulting sector, there does not seem to be any "typical day".

Many of Paragon One's students want to work in fields like data analysis, data science, consulting, market research, and software engineering.

In hindsight, this turned out to be excellent training for a career in the private sector, in the environmental science consulting community.

Merrilea Mayo, founder of the science consulting firm Mayo Enterprises in Washington, D.C., and former director of the U.S. National Academies Government-University-Industry Government-University-Industry Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable change their approach to hiring.

And Joyce Tsuji, a toxicologist at the science consulting company Exponent in Bellevue, Washington, warns that evaluating a baby's arsenic intake from rice against drinking water standards is an "apples to oranges" comparison because water standards are based on risks extrapolated from studies of lifelong, high-dose exposure, not short-term childhood exposure.