Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
schools were invited
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "schools were invited" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to an event or occasion where schools are asked to participate or attend. Example: "For the annual science fair, schools were invited to submit their projects for evaluation."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
A total of 177 schools were invited, and 37 schools accepted the invitation.
Science
In all, 144 schools were invited to participate.
News & Media
Parents were consulted and feeder schools were invited to participate.
News & Media
Women had "play days" -- young women from other schools were invited to play volleyball or tennis, or to swim.
News & Media
So the results of the race were wiped out and all the schools were invited to compete again two days later -- all except Mount Vernon, which was disqualified.
News & Media
Selected schools were invited to participate.
All 209 sixth graders at the two schools were invited to participate in the study.
Using purposive sampling, 13 schools were invited, aiming to create a sample representative of schools in the region.
Those plans were squashed when the two schools were invited to play in the third Kickoff game.
News & Media
Schools were invited until saturation was reached.
Science
All schools were invited to participate and could register online.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When writing about invitations to schools, specify the purpose and context of the invitation clearly. For example, instead of just saying "schools were invited", specify what they were invited to participate in, such as "schools were invited to a science fair".
Common error
Avoid ambiguity by specifying who extended the invitation. Instead of "schools were invited", consider "The organization invited schools" to clarify the source of the invitation.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "schools were invited" functions as a passive construction, indicating that schools are the recipients of an action (being invited). This aligns with Ludwig AI's assessment and is supported by numerous examples showing schools as the subject of invitations to participate in studies, events, and programs.
Frequent in
Science
67%
News & Media
31%
Formal & Business
2%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "schools were invited" is a grammatically correct and very common passive construction used to convey that schools received an invitation. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, the phrase serves to introduce the participation of schools in various studies, programs, or events. To ensure clarity, it's best practice to specify the purpose of the invitation and the source extending it. Consider alternatives like "schools received an invitation" or "an invitation was extended to schools" for nuanced emphasis.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
schools received an invitation
Rephrases the invitation as a received action, emphasizing the schools' perspective.
schools were requested to participate
Uses "requested" instead of "invited", suggesting a slightly more formal tone.
schools were asked to join
Replaces "invited" with "asked to join", simplifying the language.
an invitation was extended to schools
Emphasizes the act of extending the invitation, providing a more formal tone.
schools were welcomed to participate
Uses "welcomed" instead of "invited", suggesting a more inclusive and encouraging tone.
schools were solicited for participation
"Solicited" indicates a more active seeking of participation, potentially implying a specific need.
schools had the opportunity to participate
Focuses on the opportunity given to schools, shifting the emphasis from the invitation itself.
schools were encouraged to apply
Suggests a formal application process following the initial invitation.
schools were prompted to attend
"Prompted" implies a degree of urging or encouragement to attend a specific event.
schools were considered for selection
Indicates that the schools were considered as potential participants, implying a selection process.
FAQs
How can I use "schools were invited" in a sentence?
You can use "schools were invited" to indicate that schools received an invitation to participate in an event, study, or program. For example, "Schools were invited to participate in the annual science competition."
What's a more formal alternative to "schools were invited"?
A more formal alternative could be "an invitation was extended to schools", which emphasizes the act of extending the invitation.
Is it better to use active or passive voice when saying that schools received an invitation?
While "schools were invited" is grammatically correct, using the active voice, such as "The organizers invited schools", can provide greater clarity about who extended the invitation.
What can I say instead of "schools were invited" if I want to emphasize encouragement?
If you want to emphasize encouragement, you could say "schools were encouraged to apply" or "schools were welcomed to participate", depending on the context.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested