Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
The notably worse scholastic scores associated with poor left-hand function suggest that this may be a useful measure alone or in combination with others.
Poorer left-hand function was associated with lower average scholastic scores than poorer right-hand function, except for non-verbal general ability where low right-hand function was associated with somewhat lower scores.
Similar(57)
The figure also shows that with the exception of scholastic competence scores and the behavioral conduct scores among the normal-weight children, all the other scores were below the 2.80 unit.
In further analyses, the two higher right-hand motor function score thirds were combined to ensure that the statistical significance of associations of laterality with the scholastic test scores in the lowest right-hand motor function stratum were not due to greater statistical power.
"Generalized", "Social" and "Scholastic" anxiety scores did not correlate with any SAFA-S subscale.
Poorer results from tests of hand control, particularly for the left side, are associated with lower scholastic test scores.
A limitation of the stratified design is that it could underestimate the overall magnitude of associations with scholastic test scores.
The estimates are for a point change in the scholastic test scores, after adjustment for sex, left-hand motor function and social class.
Interestingly, the combination of low left-hand function with either low or high right-hand function was associated with lower scholastic test scores.
There were no notable gradients in the association of laterality with the scholastic test scores across the two higher right-hand motor function strata.
Although the average scholastic test scores tended to be lower among those who were mixed-handed than for left-handedness, no statistically significant differences were observed when mixed-handedness was compared with left-handedness.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com