The phrase "scholarly discussions" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to conversations or debates that are academic in nature, often involving research or intellectual topics.
Example: "The conference will feature a series of scholarly discussions on the latest advancements in renewable energy."
Alternatives: "academic debates" or "intellectual discussions."
Context collapse has been around in scholarly discussions of broadcast media since the 1980s.
The Columbia University Libraries will collaborate with prize recipients to create online study guides related to the winning works, incorporating historical research and scholarly discussions.
Its publisher, HarperCollins, is trying to tap into what appears to be a near-endless reserve of affection for the book by helping to organize parties, movie screenings, readings and scholarly discussions.
The cardinal virtue of humaneness, when conceived as a sentiment of benevolence or as a conscientious concern, has played a key role in scholarly discussions within environmental philosophy, bioethics, and the ethics of care (particularly in medical ethics).
Scholarly discussions have compared Mr. Springsteen not just to obvious musical forebears like Bob Dylan and Woody Guthrie, but to Walt Whitman, John Wayne, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Abraham Lincoln and Mark Twain, too.
To broaden the prize's value beyond cash, Mr. Kushner and Ms. Smith worked with Columbia on an educational component: the Columbia University Libraries will collaborate with prize recipients to create online study guides related to the winning works, incorporating historical research and scholarly discussions.
Apple has even tried to stifle scholarly discussion of them.
He doesn't deal in soundbites, but in careful rather scholarly discussion.
"Who Was Schubert?" is the title of one scholarly discussion, and no one is likely to give a confident answer.
The articles range from a scholarly discussion of Sukarno's economic legacy to profiles of his various wives.
As a result, her shows tend to be inclusive, and therefore not likely to prompt scholarly discussion.
