Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
However, Google Scholar profiles are biased towards currently active and highly active researchers.
Experiments on Google Scholar profiles of AI researchers show that the H-index can be manipulated substantially only if one merges articles with highly dissimilar titles.
We manually checked how many times the pairs were correctly assigned to the same author by looking at scholar profiles, institution websites, coauthors lists, etc.
(a) Parameters of the name disambiguation algorithm (shown in Figure 1) are optimized using Google Scholar Profiles (GSP) for measuring recall and first name initials for measuring precision.
(a) 10,000 random disambiguation parameters were tested for the 3,000 family names which we can validate with Google Scholar profiles.
This parameterized model is optimized using an h-index based recall measure, favoring the correct assignment of well-cited publications, and a name-initials-based precision using WoS metadata and cross-referenced Google Scholar profiles.
According to an analysis of STI conference presenters, 84% of scholars have web pages, 70% are on LinkedIn, 23% have public Google Scholar profiles, and 16% are on Twitter.
We do not claim such an excellent result, since even our gold standard (cross-referenced publications from Google Scholar profiles, and name initials from WoS) cannot be assumed to have error rates significantly better than that.
To tally the number of citations for each scientist, we over the past month looked up their Google Scholar profiles or, for those without a profile, used estimates produced by the Publish or Perish software, developed by business professor Anne-Wil Harzing of ESCP Europe.
Similar(2)
Even simple things like explaining impact factors, h-index etc. Do all the academics in your university know about Google Scholar citations (and its strengths and limitations) and Google Scholar profile?
To assess the rate of splitting errors we draw upon Google Scholar Profile (GSP) data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com