References Schmucker, C. and F. Schaeffel 2004 A paraxial schematic eye model for the growing C57BL/6 mouse.
Our measured value (7.7 D) is closer to two times the value from the Chaudhuri et al. rat schematic eye model (11.6 D) than the mouse schematic eye value (20.2 D).
The water-filled reduced schematic mouse eye model gives 8.8 D for the same wavelength range as the current study using total eye power values from Remtulla and Hallet [ 1, 27], which agrees very well with our experimental value.
To define CW, the focus of modeling was the anterior eye, in particular the cornea and the lens, instead of considering a more complex structured eye model; e.g., a gradient index schematic eye [ 36].
Similar to the mouse schematic eye, Chaudhuri et al. had a rat homogeneous model eye measured from enucleated eyes and their estimation for chromatic aberration was 5.8 D between 486 nm and 656 nm [ 43].
Remtulla, S. & Hallett, P. E. A schematic eye for the mouse, and comparisons with the rat.
From another angle, it's a schematic eye.
Remtulla and Hallett developed a homogeneous schematic eye from measuring frozen mouse eye sections [ 1].
The eye parameters used are those of the schematic eye, i.e., a focal length f eye=22.2mm and a constant index of refraction n eye=1.33.
Using approximations of the water-filled reduced schematic eye, the LCA ratio between different animals equals to the ratio of their total eye power [ 27].
For this purpose, we developed a simplified rat eye model (reduced schematic rat eye, or rSRE) to be used with ZEMAX, in both sequential and non-sequential mode.
