In the import/export scenario, the export of meat induces more animal husbandry so more land is needed for animal feed production, and given the crop rotation constraints, it is not possible to produce more silage maize in this scenario.
In our modelled scenarios, all types of meat and dairy products were equally likely to be replaced.
However, the scenario-study showed that substitution of meat with other major food groups was associated with a lower mortality risk and a reduced environmental burden.
In this scenario, scientists might conduct an evaluation of meat, fish, and dairy products to determine whether diet is a significant source for the chemical.
Usage scenarios are presented to explain how the different types of meat supply chain actors can use transparency systems that are based on the architecture.
This questionnaire includes 25 items wherein participants are asked to rate level of disgust or discomfort with potentially disgust-eliciting scenarios (e.g., "You see maggots on a piece of meat in an outdoor garbage pail").
The CCC dietary scenarios are described in Table 1, using comparison with the UK diet in 2005 as baseline (for example, scenario 1 has meat consumption at 36% of the consumption of meat in 2005).
The subsample of the NDNS that achieved similar levels of meat and dairy consumption as required for scenario 1 consumed 81% more fruit and vegetables and 18% more cereals and potatoes than the full NDNS sample.
The 35-gram reduction of meat was well within the intake variation (standard deviation) of 55 gram and is thus a realistic scenario.
For the healthy diet scenario, a high food tax on animal products (26%% in 2030) is required to achieve the desired reduction in consumption of meat and dairy products (Table 2).
